The Democratic Senators in WI did a great disservice to the people of WI when they came back from Illinois and told the assembled, protesting, and agitated masses to go home and work on electoral politics. Outspent and politically outmaneuvered, they failed in a critical State Supreme court election, even though the winner was obviously a colossal misogynist asshole and Republican party hack - conditions only further proven by his behavior since he took office. Then the Dems were unable to take control of the state senate in the recall elections. The mainstream unions, being the prison bitches of the Dems, did nothing but take orders from the Dems during this process. When I was in Madison I could not believe how many people I saw wearing mainstream union t-shirts who were calling for a general strike. That longing for direct action was suppressed, and that was a huge strategic error. Now reports are that Madison has one of the weakest Occupy efforts in the country, which is amazing considering all of the radical and labor networks there are in Madison.
All that said, Scott Walker is the epitome of all that is disgusting in the right-ward shift in American political life. The recall effort to get rid of him formally begins today. It is my hope that the people of WI return to a mobilization and hunger for direct action. But it would be nice to see Walker gone too.
I remember the trip my family took to Madison last winter fondly.
Wisconsin "Budget Repair Bill" Protest Pt 2 from Matt Wisniewski on Vimeo.
Georgia Ruth at her first protest. She is on State Street here where it intersects at the Capitol. She's been to several other protests since. She and her sisters will be at another one tonight.
Last night Bloomberg ordered the NYPD to destroy OWS. After getting home from a conversation regarding Occupy at the Lamplighter (one of the last holdouts of dive sanity in Memphis) with Comrades representing several different radical organizations, I watched on livestream in the wee hours of the morning as dumpstrucks were filled with all manner of equipment and gear. A New York City Councilman and former taxi driver, Ydanis Rodriguez, was among the arrested and was reported to have been given a bloody head thanks to a policeman's baton (see one of the video's of that sort of thing here). This morning Bloomberg is keeping Zuccotti Park closed in defiance of court order.
An interesting dynamic in all of this is that there has been a fair amount of mainstream union participation at OWS actions and the mainstream unions have tried, at least rhetorically, to ride the OWS bandwagon a bit (perhaps over-framing it as singularly against Republican interests) and after the heinous actions of the NYPD as the billionaire's puppet there is some anticipation that OWS may call for a nation-wide general strike. The key to a nation-wide general strike is the involvement of the large unions. If the Teamsters alone get all of their truck drivers to refrain from work for one day the country's commerce essentially gets a wrench thrown in the wheel. If just half of all AFL-CIO, AFSCME, UAW, etc., workers were to refuse to work on a given day the effect would be pronounced. I don't think the major unions have the cajones to actually go through with this, but the debate which would ensue upon the call for a general strike and the resulting backlash whether they embraced the strike or not will only help those radicals working within the larger unions to further press for radicalization within those unions. There is no slam dunk to be had in these struggles, but the opportunity to apply increased pressure at this time is greater than it has been for ages.
A chilling, if predictable, photo taken by a comrade at OWS last night:
fragments of an attempted writing.
During my routine quarterly search for wind-up clown videos on Youtube (I prefer them with accordions but take whatever I can get) I didn't find much new that was of interest to me but I did find a video of this Marx Electric Robot that I found compelling.
There is information here on this type of toy robot.
There is information here on this type of toy robot.
a spectre is haunting conservative media — the spectre of communism.... well, teeny, tiny but wickedly internet viral communism, but apparently that counts as a red horde these days....
So there is a list of groups "behind" OWS and the Occupy movement going around. It is pretty much the same list no matter which conservative/libertarian hack is offering it. Take, for instance, this from the Washington Times:
There is nothing noteworthy about the list as a whole. Of course the KKK and CPUSA are not conspiring together to take down the U.S. government, and while there have been plenty of "out" CPUSA and SPUSA members taking part in OWS and other Occupy general assemblies and working groups, the Klan has not yet been actively involved in an "out" manner, nor has it been doing much recruiting at Occupy locations, for reasons that are utterly obvious. Governments hostile to the U.S. government are obviously going to cheer social unrest in the U.S.
What strikes me with these lists is one group in particular mentioned in them. The Marxist Student Union.
This is quite funny, actually.
The Marxist Student Union, at least the one referred to here, only exists in Memphis. Google Marxist Student Union and you will see that what comes up is the Marxist Student Union in Memphis - we have the only Marxist Student Union facebook page, blog, and so forth. It is a group of Marxist students (from a variety of Marxist persuasions) and students interested in Marxism. Once a month they discuss a reading or watch a documentary. They support some progressive actions on campus, such as the living wage campaign for U of Memphis janitors. The MSU recently worked on the successful election campaign of the first earnestly pro-union and progressive city council member Memphis has had in ages. Some of the MSU members like to drink beer together. Extremely subversive stuff. You know, like what you would expect the Shelby County Young Democrats to do if they actually did anything.
So some weeks ago one of the leaders of the Marxist Student Union (henceforth MSU) was in Chicago, and marched with some other "out" communists at one of the Occupy Chicago marches. This leader of the MSU, James, is a PhD student at the U of Memphis and it seems a disgruntled ex-student of James' sent social media photos from James' FB page to some very conservative/libertarian sites. This anti-big govt site ran a little exposé on James, the CPUSAers at Occupy Chicago, and the MSU.
And from there the MSU starts to get mentioned all over conservative media - I'm told these lists of groups "behind" OWS have been read on Limbaugh and Beck.
What is funny about that is this - the MSU has a whopping 12 or so people who would identify as members from all of 3 local colleges and universities and perhaps 30 people total who have attended an MSU event or touched base with the MSU in the last year. Other than in Memphis the MSU has had nothing to do with the formation or maintenance of an Occupy location, and here in Memphis the MSU is one group among many who participate. Memphis is not exactly the center of the Occupy movement or particularly influential upon other Occupy locations. James, an all around good guy and busy activist, is very active at Occupy Memphis, but I'm not sure than all of the other members of the MSU have yet to attend an Occupy Memphis event or show up at their Occupation site.
It's this sort of utterly laughable and remarkably fanciful "connecting the dots" that leaves me chuckling when I read almost all conservative descriptions of what is "behind" the Occupy movement - or their attempts to describe the vandalism in Oakland and so forth. The Marxist Student Union has a name which strikes a chord with conservative propagandists and one of its leaders has had pictures taken waving the red flag with known communists, like, uh four of them, with an average age of probably 35 or so, and one of them, gasp, campaigned for Obomber. Horror of horrors the red legion is all around us now. I suppose the lesson here is that it doesn't take very big bait to red bait.
The MSU was very thankful to have received all the attention. Their website has now had hits galore, and it's revolutionary street cred among leftists in Memphis has increased considerably, as they are now the only nationally recognized leftist student group in Memphis. Should the Marxist Student Union ever become a Marxist group of notable size in multiple locations, it will no doubt have paranoid conservatives to thank for the initial PR and fame.
Occupy Wall Street has attracted interesting friends along the way. It garners support from such illustrious groups as the Communist Party USA, American Nazi Party, Socialist Party USA, Marxist Student Union, Black Panthers and the white supremacist group White Revolution. Sympathetic foreigners include Hezbollah, the North Korean government, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (the supreme leader of Iran), the Communist Party of China and Venezuelan strongman Hugo Chavez. American leaders who have expressed support for Occupy Wall Street include President Obama, Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and former Grand Wizard of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan David Duke. Wow. Imagine those gatherings.More instances of this list in use can be seen here, here, here, here, and here.
There is nothing noteworthy about the list as a whole. Of course the KKK and CPUSA are not conspiring together to take down the U.S. government, and while there have been plenty of "out" CPUSA and SPUSA members taking part in OWS and other Occupy general assemblies and working groups, the Klan has not yet been actively involved in an "out" manner, nor has it been doing much recruiting at Occupy locations, for reasons that are utterly obvious. Governments hostile to the U.S. government are obviously going to cheer social unrest in the U.S.
What strikes me with these lists is one group in particular mentioned in them. The Marxist Student Union.
This is quite funny, actually.
The Marxist Student Union, at least the one referred to here, only exists in Memphis. Google Marxist Student Union and you will see that what comes up is the Marxist Student Union in Memphis - we have the only Marxist Student Union facebook page, blog, and so forth. It is a group of Marxist students (from a variety of Marxist persuasions) and students interested in Marxism. Once a month they discuss a reading or watch a documentary. They support some progressive actions on campus, such as the living wage campaign for U of Memphis janitors. The MSU recently worked on the successful election campaign of the first earnestly pro-union and progressive city council member Memphis has had in ages. Some of the MSU members like to drink beer together. Extremely subversive stuff. You know, like what you would expect the Shelby County Young Democrats to do if they actually did anything.
So some weeks ago one of the leaders of the Marxist Student Union (henceforth MSU) was in Chicago, and marched with some other "out" communists at one of the Occupy Chicago marches. This leader of the MSU, James, is a PhD student at the U of Memphis and it seems a disgruntled ex-student of James' sent social media photos from James' FB page to some very conservative/libertarian sites. This anti-big govt site ran a little exposé on James, the CPUSAers at Occupy Chicago, and the MSU.
And from there the MSU starts to get mentioned all over conservative media - I'm told these lists of groups "behind" OWS have been read on Limbaugh and Beck.
What is funny about that is this - the MSU has a whopping 12 or so people who would identify as members from all of 3 local colleges and universities and perhaps 30 people total who have attended an MSU event or touched base with the MSU in the last year. Other than in Memphis the MSU has had nothing to do with the formation or maintenance of an Occupy location, and here in Memphis the MSU is one group among many who participate. Memphis is not exactly the center of the Occupy movement or particularly influential upon other Occupy locations. James, an all around good guy and busy activist, is very active at Occupy Memphis, but I'm not sure than all of the other members of the MSU have yet to attend an Occupy Memphis event or show up at their Occupation site.
It's this sort of utterly laughable and remarkably fanciful "connecting the dots" that leaves me chuckling when I read almost all conservative descriptions of what is "behind" the Occupy movement - or their attempts to describe the vandalism in Oakland and so forth. The Marxist Student Union has a name which strikes a chord with conservative propagandists and one of its leaders has had pictures taken waving the red flag with known communists, like, uh four of them, with an average age of probably 35 or so, and one of them, gasp, campaigned for Obomber. Horror of horrors the red legion is all around us now. I suppose the lesson here is that it doesn't take very big bait to red bait.
The MSU was very thankful to have received all the attention. Their website has now had hits galore, and it's revolutionary street cred among leftists in Memphis has increased considerably, as they are now the only nationally recognized leftist student group in Memphis. Should the Marxist Student Union ever become a Marxist group of notable size in multiple locations, it will no doubt have paranoid conservatives to thank for the initial PR and fame.
11-11-11 Haymarket Martyrs Day
Today is the 124th anniversary of the execution of the Haymarket Martyrs - August Spies, Albert Parsons, Adolf Fischer, and George Engel.
From Wiki:
[On November 11, 1887] Spies, Parsons, Fischer and Engel were taken to the gallows in white robes and hoods. They sang the Marseillaise, then the anthem of the international revolutionary movement. Family members including Lucy Parsons, who attempted to see them for the last time, were arrested and searched for bombs (none were found). According to witnesses, in the moments before the men were hanged, Spies shouted, "The time will come when our silence will be more powerful than the voices you strangle today!"[41] Witnesses reported that the condemned men did not die immediately when they dropped, but strangled to death slowly, a sight which left the spectators visibly shaken.
124 years ago today Louis Lingg, Haymarket Martyr, committed suicide in prison the day before he was to be executed.
From Wiki:
Lingg, the youngest of those sentenced to death, took his own life on November 10, the day before he was scheduled to hang. He used a small bomb (a blasting cap smuggled to him by a fellow prisoner). He put it in his mouth and lit it at 9AM; it blew off his lower jaw and destroyed a large portion of his face. He survived in agony for another 6 hours, until his death at around 3PM. It was believed by many that he didn't want his fate to be in the hands of the oppressors and would rather be a martyr for the cause, by his own volition.
on left populist myths and sentiments...
Continuing the discussion of bank transfer and the hate of big (as opposed to small) business in this radio interview with Sasha Lilley and Doug Henwood, here.
A description of the talk: Moving your money out of the big banks that have helped create the deepest economic crisis since the Great Depression may seem like an excellent idea. But leftwing journalist Doug Henwood believes such actions--along with community currencies and attempts to abolish corporate personhood--are misguided. Henwood discusses the long, and problematic, history of American populism, and what a radical approach to finance might look like.
Also discussed is "End the Fed" fetishes, populism both left and right, a sort-kinda defense of Bernanke (as the best actor in this miserable opera), Marx on the creation of the corporation (and its need of being socialized), and more fun stuff.
Interesting and worth a listen. His discussion on the need for "scope and scale" with regard to the existence of corporations chastises me.
A description of the talk: Moving your money out of the big banks that have helped create the deepest economic crisis since the Great Depression may seem like an excellent idea. But leftwing journalist Doug Henwood believes such actions--along with community currencies and attempts to abolish corporate personhood--are misguided. Henwood discusses the long, and problematic, history of American populism, and what a radical approach to finance might look like.
Also discussed is "End the Fed" fetishes, populism both left and right, a sort-kinda defense of Bernanke (as the best actor in this miserable opera), Marx on the creation of the corporation (and its need of being socialized), and more fun stuff.
Interesting and worth a listen. His discussion on the need for "scope and scale" with regard to the existence of corporations chastises me.
Happy 94th anniversary of the Great October Revolution everyone!
small may be beautiful, but it ain't the way out.
One of the things I disagree with OWS and the more populist side of anti-finance in this country is the "Official Bank Transfer Day" and these promotions of transferring money from big banks to credit unions as a way of hurting the banks. I used to think this financial localism "mattered" but I'm not inclined to think so anymore. Keep in mind what a low percentage of overall financial assets the bottom 80% of Americans have anyway. 1/4 of them could transfer to credit unions, and in the grand scheme of things it wouldn't matter much at all.
See Doug Henwood on the futility of these bank to credit union campaigns.
I'm all for going into a Bank of America and raising hell as you get your cash out of there. Just don't spin the withdrawal of money as something which actually hurts Wall Street. It doesn't.
There has also been a lot of rhetoric from Occupy circles supporting doing business with small businesses as a means of attacking Wall Street. I think this is similarly misguided. Small businessmen invest a substantial portion of their wealth in financial markets, or at least the vast majority of them do. Small businesses suck at the teat of mass finance and their loan payments feed the beast. The idea that small businessmen heavily re-invest in local communities is a notion perhaps more romantic than it is accurate. So a bit more of their money goes local - that money still moves in and out of mass finance vehicles constantly because we are all "in the shit." The idea that small businessmen are going to offer pay better and offer better benefits than larger businesses has no basis in economic data. Many people seem to think that small businessmen are generally less ruthless and cunning and apathetic toward worker misery than businessmen working for large corporations. I wonder how much experience the people who hold these views actually have working for small businessmen.
I used to argue for the use of credit unions and hyper-localist spending whenever possible on moral grounds - the logic being that I, at least, should try to do as little damage as possible in my economic transactions. I was wrong, first for the moralism, but second for the tactical error. If one is not taking extreme measures to go off grid (of the sort perhaps a few thousand people worldwide accomplish - people whose effect upon capitalism counts as zilch), then the only thing one can do concretely is to consume less, the wheres and whens and with whoms of consumption don't really matter much, and let's face it, me consuming 10 or 20% less than I did last year has virtually no effect on capitalism, the environment, and so forth. If I start a movement which gets 33% of Americans to consume 10% less, in just about any reasonable scheme of things this amounts to nothing substantial with regard to the an assault on capitalism or the protection of the earth's resources.
About 45 minutes from my wife's hometown in central WI is a thriving Amish community. They have all sorts of shops, bakeries, dairy operations, and the like. Chartered buses bring petit-bourgeois folks from the Twin Cities, the Milwaukee suburbs, and Chicago. Almost every one of the Amish stores takes credit cards. Many of the Amish there are quite wealthy and they keep their money in banks.
It's not really any different when I buy beef (which I don't because I can't afford it) from the local organic beef producer in my county in West TN. He takes credit cards, he buys organic feed from a large corporation, he finances his large trucks which guzzle gas like any other farmer's. His son (who works there) vacations at Disneyworld with family in tow. I have friends at a workers co-op in the Twin Cities. They are decent folk, and they do good work. But let's face it, they all seem to smoke cigs made by large corporations, put BP gas in their cars, and use the credit behemoth when ordering concert tickets. Many of them buy second hand clothes too sure, but in the end, those offsets have nominal effect. And the local Goodwill and Salvation Army take credit cards too.
There is no consumer-choice-magic out for escaping the reach of capitalism and its normative mechanisms. This isn't to say worker's co-ops are a waste of effort, or that buying second hand clothes with cash is bad, or that eating locally grown peas is wrong. Do that if you want to, but if you eat those organic peas on mass produced paper plates, don't sweat it. These "go small and buy local" fads are simply not solutions to meta-level problems, they pose no threat to capitalism, and when taken as an end in themselves they reinforce capitalism. They may make for a more enjoyable lifestyle, and when we think that they are moral acts which make us "better" for having done them, in doing these things we are playing the capitalist game as well as anyone else. Only the masses can actually confront capitalism, and meta/mass collective solutions are the only solutions that don't amount to lifestyle choices.
Here is a new, slightly expanded version of Doug Henwood's take on the big to small banking matter.
on anarcho-liberalism
A Bhaskar Sunkara piece in Dissent followed by two Cyrus Lewis elaborations on the subject via Jacobin, part i and part ii.
Essential reading. A lot to chew on there. I think Lewis suffers from a bit of NYCleftocentrism, painting the whole of the Occupy movement with issues that more intensely relate to OWS (many Occupy locations have made demands, etc.), but the tensions described in Lewis' posts and the problem of the relation of anarcho-liberalism to neo-liberalism is well stated.
From what I have been told, the old left and the syndicalists (some of whom contrast themselves from WTO style anarchisms, thus perhaps from the anarcho-liberal ethos) have more influence upon the West Coast Occupations than they have at OWS. I wonder if that is a factor.
My favorite bits in all of this - Sunkara's description of the traits of anarcho-liberalism including - an anti-intellectualism that manifested itself in a rejection of “grand narratives” and structural critiques of capitalism, abhorrence for the traditional forms of left-wing organization, a localist impulse, and an individualistic tendency to conflate lifestyle choices with political action. Lewis on Tactical Media's "nomadic agency" and "hit and run" cliquish approach to protest that actually reinforces neo-liberalism. Lewis on Chronos and OWS. Lewis on the banality of "raising awareness" and his inference of this being perhaps exemplary of "lifestyle" politics. And Lewis on OWS as possibly being a negation of a negation.
Essential reading. A lot to chew on there. I think Lewis suffers from a bit of NYCleftocentrism, painting the whole of the Occupy movement with issues that more intensely relate to OWS (many Occupy locations have made demands, etc.), but the tensions described in Lewis' posts and the problem of the relation of anarcho-liberalism to neo-liberalism is well stated.
From what I have been told, the old left and the syndicalists (some of whom contrast themselves from WTO style anarchisms, thus perhaps from the anarcho-liberal ethos) have more influence upon the West Coast Occupations than they have at OWS. I wonder if that is a factor.
My favorite bits in all of this - Sunkara's description of the traits of anarcho-liberalism including - an anti-intellectualism that manifested itself in a rejection of “grand narratives” and structural critiques of capitalism, abhorrence for the traditional forms of left-wing organization, a localist impulse, and an individualistic tendency to conflate lifestyle choices with political action. Lewis on Tactical Media's "nomadic agency" and "hit and run" cliquish approach to protest that actually reinforces neo-liberalism. Lewis on Chronos and OWS. Lewis on the banality of "raising awareness" and his inference of this being perhaps exemplary of "lifestyle" politics. And Lewis on OWS as possibly being a negation of a negation.
An exchange between Daniel Larison and Corey Robin about conservatism and reaction.
An interesting discussion. Reading this helped to further clarify some of the inclinations behind my own abandonment of (would-be) idiosyncratic conservatisms and my return to the radical left.
The Larison/Robin exchange will be of especial interest to folks who have a background or interest in anti-war conservatism, distributism, paleo-conservatism, front-porcherism, crunchyconism, red toryism, and the like, and who try to place these conservatisms vis-Ã -vis other conservatisms and vis-Ã -vis the left. It's not that anything gets resolved here, only that the way each writer frames his position is of interest - perhaps a helpful drawing of lines if you will.
An interesting discussion. Reading this helped to further clarify some of the inclinations behind my own abandonment of (would-be) idiosyncratic conservatisms and my return to the radical left.
The Larison/Robin exchange will be of especial interest to folks who have a background or interest in anti-war conservatism, distributism, paleo-conservatism, front-porcherism, crunchyconism, red toryism, and the like, and who try to place these conservatisms vis-Ã -vis other conservatisms and vis-Ã -vis the left. It's not that anything gets resolved here, only that the way each writer frames his position is of interest - perhaps a helpful drawing of lines if you will.
vote for Moises!
Reading the Maps is one of my favorite blogs. For instance, this post, noting the 103 year old Moises Broggi, a surgeon with the International Brigades during the Spanish Civil War who is now a senatorial candidate (for the Republican Left of Catalonia) in the upcoming Spanish elections.
general strike
I like the combination of the red and black syndicalist general strike poster aesthetic with the day of the dead theme. Good show fellow workers in Oakland.
As of this writing the news is reporting 4,000-4,500 or so folks at the port in Oakland this evening; Wobblies and Commies on the ground there reported around 10,000. The numbers are always a bit of a crap shoot. The port is now effectively shut down and a few moments ago the ILWU said longshoremen scheduled to work tonight have been sent home and/or told not to report to work. There are plans among the strikers for an overnight occupation (nighttime is a very busy time at a port - the Port of Oakland's 7pm shift is it's busiest shift). The Port of Oakland handles a container volume of just under 61,000 containers a day. Their website states that an estimated average of $11,000,000 in goods passes through the port each day, but that seems low to me as that would mean that each 20'x20' container has only $180 or so worth of goods in it. Oakland's is the fifth busiest port in the U.S.
The spokesperson for the ILWU has said that the longshoremen's union is contractually obligated such that they cannot sanction a strike at this time, but the longshoreman's union has had a number of struggles of late - a longshoreman's wildcat strike briefly shut down the Ports of Seattle and Tacoma in September of this year, and a wildcat protest at the Port of Longview involved overpowering and holding security guards, damaging railroad cars, and dumping grain. As anyone who follows American labor knows, the ILWU is a union that has a relatively radicalized membership. After hearing of the call for a general strike on Nov. 2nd, members of the ILWU spoke at the Occupy Oakland general assembly and asked the GA to occupy the Port of Oakland on the day of the general strike. ILWU members also spoke at the OWS GA and several other large GAs across the country, asking for support for the occupation of the Oakland General Strike and the occupation of the Port of Oakland during this general strike.
$11,000,000 (or so) slowed down by 24 hours (great if it were more but that seems very unlikely) is barely a blip on the radar screen of American capitalism. But this moment is an important one nonetheless. Even if all the general strikers were to leave the Port of Oakland a few hours from now, they did manage to effectively shut down the Port and stop freight traffic around the port, the general strike did involve workers from all sectors, it had union leadership support in some cases, and in other cases involved rather overt wildcat actions within unions, about every radical organization in America was involved, with heavy representation by the IWW which has a substantial number of members active within both the ILWU and among the regulars at Occupy Oakland, and of course there were a number of people not associated with any union or any radical organization who showed up to today's general strike and were pressed in a more radical direction. But the key is that a general strike was called, workers from all sectors responded, and the Port was shut down. This means that today we have seen the first effective general strike in America in the last 65 years.
Of course nothing may come of this anytime soon. Of course conservatives and many liberals will ask what the point of all this is and in various and sundry ways write it off as not much more than puerile venting by the "unwashed masses." Many will continue their feigned confusion and sheepishly repeat their droned question "what do the protesters want to accomplish?"
And maybe Occupy Everywhere will fall apart next week. Or during the next cold wave. Or 6 weeks from now due to internal divisions and/or the perception that moveon.org or some other group "took over" the movement.
In American labor history direct actions usually "fail," as does just about every tactic ever used by labor. There are generally many more "losses" than successes with any attempt at the use of direct action toward a given end - if by loss you mean that there was no immediate threat to capital and/or no immediate granting of labor demands. General strike movements usually putter about for months or years before, if ever, they have a clear and direct success. But when they succeed in actually shutting down commerce in a given area they tend to strike some fear into the powers that be - at least the past efforts used to get rid of radical elements within labor suggest as much. The more direct action you see, the more carrot and/or stick is used to cease the instigators of those direct actions. And in American labor history this has been accomplished through an often surprising coalition of anti-radical forces and an incredible amount of fervency and efficiency. Strange bedfellows and generally slow moving bureaucratic forces can really come together when the matter-at-hand is de-radicalizing a labor uprising.
You don't need that many successfully conducted general strikes to make the threat of a general strike carry some weight. That mainstream union locals are now publicly supporting the use of general strikes (as was seen in WI before the Dems got the feet off the ground in Madison, and is currently seen in Oakland where even a UAW local sanctioned its members' participation in the strike) suggests that there is at least a chance that mainstream labor, long a bastion of the worst effects of liberal policies and liberal ideology, has potential to be radicalized again. This is significant.
We are now in a post-Fukuyama period. As many have noted, we’ve past the “end of history” and lo and behold, history has emerged again. It seems that most anarchists and old leftists will tell you that they don’t expect the Occupy movement to “succeed” by conventional standards of a political success. But these folks in the same breath will tell you that it doesn't have to succeed to succeed. All it has to do is to display to the masses that paradigm of on-the-streets militancy as the initial primary vehicle through which to confront power in our culture. It has to re-radicalize just a moderate portion the left and/or left-inclined and/or use-to-be-left and/or would-have-been-left-had-it-not-been-for-conservative-populism. Organization can come later. Agreed upon political theory can come later, or not. Of course, many anarchist and old leftist groups had the same “later” approach in the 60s and 70s, but in the 60s and 70s the liberal project still held promise. Outside of places like Washington DC and academic settings, that promise is pretty much bankrupt in our culture today, especially among the lower ranks of the working classes. In many respects it makes more sense for them to embrace an overt conservatism today than it does for them to keep being played by liberals. If things continue to decline economically and politically, even in America more and more people will be open to the ethos of protest militancy and direct actions - actions which infuriate the liberal establishment because it bypasses them. If active discontent among the working classes continues to expand, watch for increased red-baiting, the old liberal standard in the face of increasingly radicalized workers.
In the near term to medium term either there will be some sort of temporary scheme which creates something close enough to a 90s boom to create job growth and assuage the public (this would provide a band aid until the edifice behind it collapses), or there will be continued economic decline for most Americans. Whether actual or perceived decline does not matter. This will increase class tensions, increase the likelihood of people to become militant, and so forth. At some point the right will no longer be able to use the “get a job” “look at those affluent wanna-be hippie” "$34,000 a year puts you in the top 1% in the world" canards, and then the right will have to go the route it always does in crisis – towards a nationalism which uses the usual fuels for nationalist fears – racism, foreign aggressors & intrigue, red-baiting, and so forth. I don’t know that the left in this country will be able to overcome the onslaught from the right when this plays out. The "usual suspect" left today is impotent in electoral politics and pretty much so in the culture at large. It is hard to imagine the American people not being pulled and prodded into a more dramatic right wing nationalistic furor if social unrest were to escalate. We seem ripe for that in so many respects. Then again, five years ago who would have predicted a successful American general strike in five years time?
Lastly, a small group of anarchists paid a visit to the Whole Foods in Oakland on this day, which ought to warm the heart of anyone who has ever admired Phil Och's Love Me I'm A Liberal song, as Whole Foods is such a magnet for that set today:
In the near term to medium term either there will be some sort of temporary scheme which creates something close enough to a 90s boom to create job growth and assuage the public (this would provide a band aid until the edifice behind it collapses), or there will be continued economic decline for most Americans. Whether actual or perceived decline does not matter. This will increase class tensions, increase the likelihood of people to become militant, and so forth. At some point the right will no longer be able to use the “get a job” “look at those affluent wanna-be hippie” "$34,000 a year puts you in the top 1% in the world" canards, and then the right will have to go the route it always does in crisis – towards a nationalism which uses the usual fuels for nationalist fears – racism, foreign aggressors & intrigue, red-baiting, and so forth. I don’t know that the left in this country will be able to overcome the onslaught from the right when this plays out. The "usual suspect" left today is impotent in electoral politics and pretty much so in the culture at large. It is hard to imagine the American people not being pulled and prodded into a more dramatic right wing nationalistic furor if social unrest were to escalate. We seem ripe for that in so many respects. Then again, five years ago who would have predicted a successful American general strike in five years time?
Lastly, a small group of anarchists paid a visit to the Whole Foods in Oakland on this day, which ought to warm the heart of anyone who has ever admired Phil Och's Love Me I'm A Liberal song, as Whole Foods is such a magnet for that set today:
Tearing down the white picket fence at Whole Foods Oakland.
Re-arranging the seating at Whole Foods Oakland.
Facelift for Whole Foods Oakland.
Advertising community activities at Whole Foods Oakland. How localist!
mills and the dross.
Poor David Mills. He tries. He incessantly tries. What isn’t now tiresomely derivative (“mostly affluent”**), reveals a practiced ignorance of the left in this country. His begging for a left with which to interact carries that affected condescending tone from which Mills will never escape.
The people conceptually and “organizationally” behind the Occupy protests (David Graeber & pals) are anarchists. They do not want a political solution. They want to initiate broad social transformations which bypass the political process. The old leftists who are now participating in Occupy (and have been since about week 2 or so), very much disagree with that approach and want Occupiers to turn their energy toward the political, whether within mainstream politics or through radical political mechanisms. They want to make clear political demands and so forth.
What I have just outlined has been the subject of debate and discussion on thousands of left wing blogs, and just about every leftist think tank in America that has anything close to a connection to radical politics in this country. It has been the subject of public debate which caught the eye of right wing populist politicos like Limbaugh and Beck. Thus that Mills, on Oct 31, thinks he has something to say by pointing out that a lack of engagement with politics “gets you nowhere” suggests the intellectual bubble in which he lives and moves and has his being.
Both the old left and the anarchists agree that Occupy is worthwhile because it incites anger, promotes class consciousness, agitates people, and has proved to be among the better recruiting tools in the last generation. When a Marine gets shot in the head by a flash grenade atOccupy Oakland, and this radicalizes a bunch of Marines who are now huntingdown the police officer who shot that flash grenade, both old left and anarchists view this as a good thing. Pictures and videos of police meanness at this point are helpful. The more the better. Best yet, as more and more vets come home looking for work they won't easily find, provide more video'd instances of police assaulting peacefully protesting vets.
Mills and the legion of late middle age writers who posit that they have “seen all this before” are completely wrong in that regard. The aesthetics may in some respects be similar, but the conditions are completely different. In the late 60s and early 70s the liberal project still had currency. And as was seen throughout the 20th century, this perceived-legitimacy-of-the-liberal-project was used to de-radicalize the left and those institutions like unions where leftists tend to reside. There was still substantial hope by a number of people across class spectrums that liberal democracies could more or less effect a general state of relative equality and economic fairness.
We are also, hopefully, at the tail end of the longest period of time in American history since the 1870s during which there were no sustained, militant, mass protests. That America might be transitioning back toward having a regular (i.e., what is now seen as commonplace in European countries) protest culture and prolonged protest movements is substantial. There is also a great deal of talk about the use of general strikes, as the one called for Oakland tomorrow. In American labor history these usually fail, as does just about every tactic ever used by labor. There are generally many more "losses" than successes with any attempt at the use of direct action toward a given end - if by loss you mean an immediate threat to capital or an immediate granting of labor demands. General strike movements usually putter about for months or years before, if ever, they have a success. But when they succeed in actually shutting down commerce in a given area they scare the hell out of the powers that be. You don't need that many successfully conducted general strikes to make the threat of a general strike carry some weight. That mainstream union locals are now publicly supporting the use of general strikes (as was seen in WI before the Dems got the feet off the ground in Madison, and is currently seen in Oakland) suggests that there is at least a chance that mainstream labor, long a bastion of the worst effects of liberal policies and liberal ideology, has potential to be radicalized again. This is significant.
We are now in a post-Fukuyama period. As many have noted now, we’ve past the “end of history” and lo and behold, history has emerged again. Most anarchist and old leftist intellectuals I know, when speaking privately, will tell you that they don’t expect the Occupy movement to “succeed.” But it doesn't have to succeed to succeed. All it has to do is to display to the masses that paradigm of on-the-streets militancy as the initial primary vehicle through which to confront power in our culture. It has to re-radicalize just a substantial portion the left. Organization can come later. Political theory can come later. Of course, many anarchist and old leftist groups had the same “later” approach in the 60s and 70s, but again, in the 60s and 70s the soft social democratic – liberal project still held promise. That promise is pretty much bankrupt in our culture today. If things continue to decline economically and politically, even in America more and more people will be open to the ethos of protest militancy and direct actions.
There is not going to be some sort of distributist or “front porch republic” solution to the economic crisis. Either there will be some sort of temporary scheme which creates something close enough to a 90s boom to create job growth and assuage the public (this would provide a band aid until the edifice behind it collapses), or there will be continued economic decline for most Americans. Whether actual or perceived decline does not matter. This will increase class tensions, increase the likelihood of people to become militant, and so forth. At some point the right will no longer be able to use the “get a job” “look at those affluent wanna-be hippie” canards, and then the right will have to go the route it always does in crisis – towards a nationalism which uses the usual fuels for nationalist fears – racism, foreign aggressors & intrigue, red-baiting, and so forth. I don’t know that the left in this country will be able to overcome the onslaught from the right when this plays out. I kind of doubt it. The right in this country is stronger than it has ever been, and I speak here not just politically, which is somewhat superficial at this point, but culturally and with regard to control of institutions of power. I only know what side I will be on.
**http://idealab.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/10/occupy-wall-street-demographic-survey-results-will-surprise-you.php - that is a low quality initial study, but I think future studies will reveal similar results with regard to economic demographics, and outside of NYC there is an even lower percentage of upper middle class participants – as the movement ages, more underemployed youth begin to participate. Here in Memphis the Occupiers started out all white and very middle class, but by the time they got on the streets the people actually doing the Occupying were only about 55% white, and mostly lower middle or working class
Any book review that ends with the paragraph:
Maybe I’m being a little too hard on liberals. After all, a liberal is fundamentally a more “decent” person than a conservative. And there’s something to be said for decency. But good manners, sympathy for the powerless, and a congenial disposition are useless in beating back conservatism after its gone hegemonic–and who could possibly deny that it has? Maybe that’s the most frightening lesson from Robin’s book, and what makes it all so hard for liberals to take: that the fight is over, the battle is lost, and the bastards won. And if we wanna do something about it, and it’s starting to look like maybe we do, we might have to summon up some of that dangerous radical fire that’s propelled every worthwhile step we’ve taken towards a more civil and egalitarian society.
...is worth a read.
Corey Robin has been kind enough to send me a free copy of his book so I will be reviewing it here in coming weeks.
Maybe I’m being a little too hard on liberals. After all, a liberal is fundamentally a more “decent” person than a conservative. And there’s something to be said for decency. But good manners, sympathy for the powerless, and a congenial disposition are useless in beating back conservatism after its gone hegemonic–and who could possibly deny that it has? Maybe that’s the most frightening lesson from Robin’s book, and what makes it all so hard for liberals to take: that the fight is over, the battle is lost, and the bastards won. And if we wanna do something about it, and it’s starting to look like maybe we do, we might have to summon up some of that dangerous radical fire that’s propelled every worthwhile step we’ve taken towards a more civil and egalitarian society.
...is worth a read.
Corey Robin has been kind enough to send me a free copy of his book so I will be reviewing it here in coming weeks.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)










